Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] h8300: Process and signal

From: Yoshinori Sato
Date: Tue Feb 17 2015 - 02:39:34 EST


At Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:38:25 +0100,
Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Yoshinori Sato
> <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + usig = current_thread_info()->exec_domain
> > + && current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap
> > + && sig < 32
> > + ? current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig]
> > + : sig;
>
> Does h8300 really need signal mapping?
> I'm very sure you can drop this.
> In fact I'm working in patch set to rip it out tree wide as we have
> only a single (broken)
> in-tree user.
>

I agree.
It remove forgot.

> --
> Thanks,
> //richard

--
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/