Re: [PATCH] ipc: Remove uses of return value of seq_printf/seq_puts

From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue Feb 17 2015 - 19:09:54 EST

On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 23:16 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Most of the time checking return value of seq_...() is better replaced with
> not doing that. And "must check return value and Do Something(tm)" is too
> strong habit for enough people to cause recurring trouble.

Does SEQ_SKIP still have value?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at