Re: [PATCH] ipc: Remove uses of return value of seq_printf/seq_puts

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 23:16 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Most of the time checking return value of seq_...() is better replaced with
> not doing that.  And "must check return value and Do Something(tm)" is too
> strong habit for enough people to cause recurring trouble.

Does SEQ_SKIP still have value?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/