Re: [GIT PULL] Fix mcelog regression

[Ingo Molnar]

* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry for bypassing normal channels, but this looks like 
> a trivial regression fix to me, but I'm getting pushback 
> from my co-maintainer and from Ingo.
> 
>   1. This used to work
>   2. Now it doesn't
>   3. People have complained
> 
> Previous threads:
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/30/641
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/11/437

So this fix is perfectly OK to me. The primary thing I 
objected to (which objection you did not quote!!), was the 
initial approach, the ugly vendor-specific switch you 
added:

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/9/237

The latest replacement commit you added looks clean - and 
/dev/mcelog is certainly a legacy we have to keep.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/