Re: [PATCH 1/1] pty: BREAK for pseudoterminals
From: Petr Tesarik
Date: Wed Feb 18 2015 - 02:06:37 EST
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:03:58 -0500
Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
> >> This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports, because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a SysRq, but there is currently no way to pass this signal over a pseudo-terminal. This patch will work for transmitting BREAK from master to slave through pseudo-terminal.
> >
> > pty is an IPC mechanism, not a virtualization driver.
> >
> > Those programs that know they're consuming from a slave pty may not
> > have bothered to set termios for BREAKs, and may not be prepared
> > for NULLs in the input stream.
>
> I'm not even seeing how this works as advertised.
>
> In QEMU, the *master* end is the source/sink for the guest VM, while the
> *slave* pty is sink/source for the host. Like this:
Yes, you're totally right. This patch implements break handling on the
"wrong" side of the pty pair. I think you have already pointed this
out in one of the previous mails, and we're waiting for a patch that
implements it on the slave side.
Regards,
Petr Tesarik
> Host <--> slave pty <===> master pty <--> qemu <==> emulated serial
> port
>
> So this patch enables the guest VM to transmit BREAK to the host.
> Why is that useful?
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nan Li <nli@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/tty/pty.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/pty.c b/drivers/tty/pty.c
> >> index e72ee62..ac8893a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/tty/pty.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tty/pty.c
> >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> >> static struct tty_driver *ptm_driver;
> >> static struct tty_driver *pts_driver;
> >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(devpts_mutex);
> >> +#define BREAK_STRING '\0'
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> static void pty_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
> >> @@ -674,6 +675,23 @@ static void pty_unix98_shutdown(struct
> >> tty_struct *tty) devpts_kill_index(tty->driver_data, tty->index);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int pty_unix98_break_ctl(struct tty_struct *tty, int
> >> break_state) +{
> >> + int c;
> >> + struct tty_struct *to = tty->link;
> >> +
> >> + if (break_state) {
> >> + /* Stuff the break data into the input queue of
> >> the other end */
> >> + c = tty_insert_flip_char(to->port, BREAK_STRING,
> >> TTY_BREAK);
> >> + /* And shovel */
> >> + if (c)
> >> + tty_flip_buffer_push(to->port);
> >> + else
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + }
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static const struct tty_operations ptm_unix98_ops = {
> >> .lookup = ptm_unix98_lookup,
> >> .install = pty_unix98_install,
> >> @@ -686,6 +704,7 @@ static const struct tty_operations
> >> ptm_unix98_ops = { .chars_in_buffer = pty_chars_in_buffer,
> >> .unthrottle = pty_unthrottle,
> >> .ioctl = pty_unix98_ioctl,
> >> + .break_ctl = pty_unix98_break_ctl,
> >> .resize = pty_resize,
> >> .shutdown = pty_unix98_shutdown,
> >> .cleanup = pty_cleanup
> >>
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/