[tip:sched/core] sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()

[tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra]

Commit-ID:  3960c8c0c7891dfc0f7be687cbdabb0d6916d614
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/3960c8c0c7891dfc0f7be687cbdabb0d6916d614
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:22:25 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:27:30 +0100

sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()

Kirill reported that a dl task can be throttled and dequeued at the
same time. This happens, when it becomes throttled in schedule(),
which is called to go to sleep:

current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule()
    deactivate_task()
        dequeue_task_dl()
            update_curr_dl()
                start_dl_timer()
            __dequeue_task_dl()
    prev->on_rq = 0;

This invalidates the assumption from commit 0f397f2c90ce ("sched/dl:
Fix race in dl_task_timer()"):

  "The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
   we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
   thus free of ttwu races".

And therefore we have to use the full task_rq_lock() here.

This further amends the fact that we forgot to update the rq lock loop
for TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATE, from commit cca26e8009d1 ("sched: Teach
scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state").

Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150217123139.GN5029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     | 76 -------------------------------------------------
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++------
 kernel/sched/sched.h    | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index fd0a6ed..f77acd9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -307,82 +307,6 @@ __read_mostly int scheduler_running;
 int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000;
 
 /*
- * __task_rq_lock - lock the rq @p resides on.
- */
-static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p)
-	__acquires(rq->lock)
-{
-	struct rq *rq;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
-
-	for (;;) {
-		rq = task_rq(p);
-		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
-		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			return rq;
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-
-		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			cpu_relax();
-	}
-}
-
-/*
- * task_rq_lock - lock p->pi_lock and lock the rq @p resides on.
- */
-static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
-	__acquires(p->pi_lock)
-	__acquires(rq->lock)
-{
-	struct rq *rq;
-
-	for (;;) {
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
-		rq = task_rq(p);
-		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
-		/*
-		 *	move_queued_task()		task_rq_lock()
-		 *
-		 *	ACQUIRE (rq->lock)
-		 *	[S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING		[L] rq = task_rq()
-		 *	WMB (__set_task_cpu())		ACQUIRE (rq->lock);
-		 *	[S] ->cpu = new_cpu		[L] task_rq()
-		 *					[L] ->on_rq
-		 *	RELEASE (rq->lock)
-		 *
-		 * If we observe the old cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire of
-		 * the old rq->lock will fully serialize against the stores.
-		 *
-		 * If we observe the new cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire will
-		 * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating.
-		 */
-		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			return rq;
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
-
-		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			cpu_relax();
-	}
-}
-
-static void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
-	__releases(rq->lock)
-{
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-}
-
-static inline void
-task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
-	__releases(rq->lock)
-	__releases(p->pi_lock)
-{
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
-}
-
-/*
  * this_rq_lock - lock this runqueue and disable interrupts.
  */
 static struct rq *this_rq_lock(void)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index a027799..e88847d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -511,16 +511,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
 						     struct sched_dl_entity,
 						     dl_timer);
 	struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
+	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rq *rq;
-again:
-	rq = task_rq(p);
-	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
 
-	if (rq != task_rq(p)) {
-		/* Task was moved, retrying. */
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-		goto again;
-	}
+	rq = task_rq_lock(current, &flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * We need to take care of several possible races here:
@@ -555,7 +549,7 @@ again:
 		push_dl_task(rq);
 #endif
 unlock:
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+	task_rq_unlock(rq, current, &flags);
 
 	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 0870db2..dc0f435 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1380,6 +1380,82 @@ static inline void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq) { }
 
 extern void start_bandwidth_timer(struct hrtimer *period_timer, ktime_t period);
 
+/*
+ * __task_rq_lock - lock the rq @p resides on.
+ */
+static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p)
+	__acquires(rq->lock)
+{
+	struct rq *rq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
+
+	for (;;) {
+		rq = task_rq(p);
+		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			return rq;
+		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+
+		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			cpu_relax();
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * task_rq_lock - lock p->pi_lock and lock the rq @p resides on.
+ */
+static inline struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
+	__acquires(p->pi_lock)
+	__acquires(rq->lock)
+{
+	struct rq *rq;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
+		rq = task_rq(p);
+		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+		/*
+		 *	move_queued_task()		task_rq_lock()
+		 *
+		 *	ACQUIRE (rq->lock)
+		 *	[S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING		[L] rq = task_rq()
+		 *	WMB (__set_task_cpu())		ACQUIRE (rq->lock);
+		 *	[S] ->cpu = new_cpu		[L] task_rq()
+		 *					[L] ->on_rq
+		 *	RELEASE (rq->lock)
+		 *
+		 * If we observe the old cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire of
+		 * the old rq->lock will fully serialize against the stores.
+		 *
+		 * If we observe the new cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire will
+		 * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating.
+		 */
+		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			return rq;
+		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
+
+		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			cpu_relax();
+	}
+}
+
+static inline void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
+	__releases(rq->lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void
+task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
+	__releases(rq->lock)
+	__releases(p->pi_lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/