Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clock: add perf_clock posix clock

[Ingo Molnar]

* John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > AFAIK Stephane is not proposing this patch for 
> > inclusion but rather it is an unfortunate necessary 
> > evil. The module exposes perf_clock (ie., local_clock) 
> > to userspace and allows in this case the generation of 
> > samples with a perf timestamp which is required for 
> > proper sorting.
> >
> > I understand this solution is not liked, but it works, 
> > requires no kernel modifications to achieve the end 
> > goal and can be used for kernels going back to at least 
> > 2.6.38 (perhaps earlier, have not checked).
> 
> Yep. And I'm sympathetic to the fact that an alternative 
> solution hasn't made it upstream yet. I'm hopeful Pawel's 
> recent approach will make it in (it seems like it hasn't 
> raised any flags w/ scheduler folks - but I've not always 
> been able to follow the discussion closely).

So if it's part of this series and reviews fine then I'll 
be happy to apply it! Nothing better than having a kernel 
patch and an actual usecase go hand in hand.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/