[PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 078/103] gpio: fix sleep-while-atomic in gpiochip_remove
From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Wed Feb 18 2015 - 19:44:13 EST
3.13.11-ckt16 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 6798acaa0138d8b12f1c54402ebcb66fea3deb03 upstream.
Move direct and indirect calls to gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges outside of
spin lock as they can end up taking a mutex in pinctrl_remove_gpio_range.
Note that the pin ranges are already added outside of the lock.
Fixes: 9ef0d6f7628b ("gpiolib: call pin removal in chip removal function")
Fixes: f23f1516b675 ("gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 3ef348f..f86386c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1256,12 +1256,11 @@ int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
int status = 0;
unsigned id;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
-
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
of_gpiochip_remove(chip);
acpi_gpiochip_remove(chip);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
for (id = 0; id < chip->ngpio; id++) {
if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &chip->desc[id].flags)) {
status = -EBUSY;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/