Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: dt: Introduce always-on clock domain documentation

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Lee,

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What kind of clocks are these? What do they control?
>> Memory controllers? Bus controllers?
>>
>> They must control some device(s), so there should be one or more device
>> nodes in DT that reference these clocks.
>> As soon as that information is in DT, support can be added to Linux to
>> make sure the "critical" clocks stay enabled, either through a real driver,
>> or through platform code.
>
> Some do, some don't.  For instance, we have one clock which controls
> SPI and I2C that must not be turned off.  We discovered this then when
> a suspend was attempted and the board refused to resume.  This clock
> also runs one of the critical interconnects that runs from the a9.  It
> would be wrong to remove the clk_disable() attempt from the SPI/I2C
> drivers because the same IP on another board might be controlled by a
> different clock which is able to be gated.
>
> There are also clocks which control other interconnects that are not
> connected to any device drivers.  If we fail to take references for
> them before clk_disable_unused() is called, again the board hangs.  We
> even lose JTAG support.

Interconnects are buses. Can't you represent those buses in the DT
hierarchy, and give them clocks properties?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/