Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86: Add ability to sample TSC

[Adrian Hunter]

On 19/02/2015 7:24 p.m., John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > With the advent of switching perf_clock to CLOCK_MONOTONIC,
> > it will not be possible to convert perf_clock directly to/from
> > TSC. So add the ability to sample TSC instead.
> >
> >
> > Adrian Hunter (2):
> >        perf: Sample additional clock value
> >        perf/x86: Provide TSC for PERF_SAMPLE_CLOCK_ARCH
>
> This doesn't seem very portable. The CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW clockid was
> added to provide a arch-neutral abstraction of a free-running hardware
> counter that isn't affected by adjtimex slewing (though like any
> counter, it will be affected by non-constant drift).
>
> You might consider looking at that if the short term slew adjustments
> (which result in more accurate timings in the long term) are
> problematic for you.

This is for Intel Processor Trace - which Peter has already
rightly chastised me for not making plain.

Intel Processor Trace (Intel PT) is a trace that is hardware generated. The
hardware does not know about linux or its clocks, so the timestamps
are TSC. I think ARM might have the same issue with ETM or such. i.e. the
need to synchronize a hardware timestamp with a perf event.

There is a description of Intel PT in the Intel Architecture manuals.

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/architectures-software-developer-manuals.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/