Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm: am33xx: DT quirks for am33xx based beaglebone variants

[Pantelis Antoniou]

Hi Tony,

> On Feb 19, 2015, at 20:36 , Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> * Pantelis Antoniou <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [150219 10:32]:
>>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 20:16 , Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Uhh I don't like the idea of duplicating the i2c-omap.c driver under
>>> arch/arm.. And in general we should initialize things later rather
>>> than earlier.
>>> 
>>> What's stopping doing these quirk checks later on time with just
>>> a regular device driver, something like drivers/misc/bbone-quirks.c?
>>> 
>> 
>> We have no choice; we are way early in the boot process, right after
>> the device tree unflattening step.
> 
> To me it seems the dt patching part should be done with minimal
> code before any driver like features..
> 

The way itâs done right now is with minimal code. Reading the EEPROM
is required.

>> Iâve toyed with the idea of using early platform devices but the omap-i2c driver
>> would need some tender love and care to make it work, and I didnât want to get
>> bogged down with i2c driver details at this point.
> 
> ..so how about just parse a kernel cmdline for the quirks to apply
> based on a version string or similar? That can be easily populated
> by u-boot or set manually with setenv.
> 
> That leaves out the need for tinkering with i2c super early in
> the kernel for revision detection.
> 

You assume thereâs going to be a bootloaderâ

> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Regards

â Pantelis

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/