Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86,fpu: remove redundant increments of fpu_counter

[Oleg Nesterov]

Borislav, Ingo,

On 02/19, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Is there consensus on the first 5 patches?

Yes, but perhaps you can also look at another series

	[PATCH 1/3] x86, fpu: __kernel_fpu_begin() should clear fpu_owner_task even if use_eager_fpu()
	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142169357231860&w=2

	[PATCH 2/3] x86, fpu: always allow FPU in interrupt if use_eager_fpu()
	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142169359331866&w=2

	[PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: don't abuse FPU in kernel threads if use_eager_fpu()
	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142169360931869&w=2

? (off course I will be happy to resend)

It was sent before the recently applied changes. And in fact in theory
728e53fef429a0f "x86/fpu: Also check fpu_lazy_restore() when use_eager_fpu()"
depends on 1/3 above.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/