[PATCH 2/2] x86: fix output of show_trace_log_lvl()

From: Adrien Schildknecht
Date: Thu Feb 19 2015 - 17:44:40 EST


Prepend the log level in printk_stack_address.
Using printk with just a log level is ignored and thus has no effect on
the next pr_cont.

Signed-off-by: Adrien Schildknecht <adrien+dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index cf3df1d..da1ab6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -25,10 +25,12 @@ unsigned int code_bytes = 64;
int kstack_depth_to_print = 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE;
static int die_counter;

-static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable)
+static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable,
+ void *data)
{
- pr_cont(" [<%p>] %s%pB\n",
- (void *)address, reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *)address);
+ pr_cont("%s [<%p>] %s%pB\n",
+ (char *)data, (void *)address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
+ (void *)address);
}

void printk_address(unsigned long address)
@@ -155,8 +157,7 @@ static int print_trace_stack(void *data, char *name)
static void print_trace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
{
touch_nmi_watchdog();
- printk(data);
- printk_stack_address(addr, reliable);
+ printk_stack_address(addr, reliable, data);
}

static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
--
2.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/