Re: [GIT PULL] locking fixes
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Feb 20 2015 - 20:52:03 EST
So here's my try at fixing READ_ONCE() so that it is happy with 'const' sources.
It is entirely untested. Comments/testing?
Christian, I guess I could just have forced a cast instead of the
union. I'd like you to take a look at this, because right now it's
holding up me pulling from Ingo.
And Ingo, I think you need to add some kind of test for "horrible new
warnings". I think your pull request *worked*, but the tens of lines
of new warnings it generates is unacceptable, and will just cause me
to undo the pull if I notice in time (like I did this time).
Linus
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How does this work for you at all?
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> index 94f643484300..e354cc6446ab 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> @@ -803,8 +808,8 @@ static void kvm_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t ticket)
>> add_stats(RELEASED_SLOW, 1);
>> for_each_cpu(cpu, &waiting_cpus) {
>> const struct kvm_lock_waiting *w = &per_cpu(klock_waiting, cpu);
>> - if (ACCESS_ONCE(w->lock) == lock &&
>> - ACCESS_ONCE(w->want) == ticket) {
>> + if (READ_ONCE(w->lock) == lock &&
>> + READ_ONCE(w->want) == ticket) {
>> add_stats(RELEASED_SLOW_KICKED, 1);
>> kvm_kick_cpu(cpu);
>> break;
>
> I get horrible compile warnings from this, because of how 'w' is a
> pointer to a 'const' structure, which then causes things like
>
> include/linux/compiler.h:262:39: warning: passing argument 1 of
> â__read_once_sizeâ discards âconstâ qualifier from pointer target type
> ({ typeof(x) __val; __read_once_size(&x, &__val, sizeof(__val)); __val; })
>
> which is fairly hard to avoid (looks like it might need a union)
>
> Linus
commit 1cb20581b0a32673fa3d056829ca89db4fa0de09
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Feb 20 15:46:31 2015 -0800
kernel: make READ_ONCE() valid on const pointers
There is certainly nothing wrong with using READ_ONCE() on a const
pointer, but the helper function __read_once_size() would cause warnings
because it would drop the 'const' qualifier.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/compiler.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index d1ec10a940ff..312cf710e26a 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static __always_inline void data_access_exceeds_word_size(void)
{
}
-static __always_inline void __read_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
+static __always_inline void __read_once_size(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
{
switch (size) {
case 1: *(__u8 *)res = *(volatile __u8 *)p; break;
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
*/
#define READ_ONCE(x) \
- ({ typeof(x) __val; __read_once_size(&x, &__val, sizeof(__val)); __val; })
+ ({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof((x))); __u.__val; })
#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
({ typeof(x) __val; __val = val; __write_once_size(&x, &__val, sizeof(__val)); __val; })