[PATCH 01/24] mm: update_lru_size warn and reset bad lru_size

From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Fri Feb 20 2015 - 22:51:26 EST


Though debug kernels have a VM_BUG_ON to help protect from misaccounting
lru_size, non-debug kernels are liable to wrap it around: and then the
vast unsigned long size draws page reclaim into a loop of repeatedly
doing nothing on an empty list, without even a cond_resched().

That soft lockup looks confusingly like an over-busy reclaim scenario,
with lots of contention on the lruvec lock in shrink_inactive_list():
yet has a totally different origin.

Help differentiate with a custom warning in mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(),
even in non-debug kernels; and reset the size to avoid the lockup. But
the particular bug which suggested this change was mine alone, and since
fixed.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/mm_inline.h | 2 +-
mm/memcontrol.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- thpfs.orig/include/linux/mm_inline.h 2013-11-03 15:41:51.000000000 -0800
+++ thpfs/include/linux/mm_inline.h 2015-02-20 19:33:25.928096883 -0800
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ static __always_inline void del_page_fro
struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
{
int nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
- mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, -nr_pages);
list_del(&page->lru);
+ mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, -nr_pages);
__mod_zone_page_state(lruvec_zone(lruvec), NR_LRU_BASE + lru, -nr_pages);
}

--- thpfs.orig/mm/memcontrol.c 2015-02-08 18:54:22.000000000 -0800
+++ thpfs/mm/memcontrol.c 2015-02-20 19:33:25.928096883 -0800
@@ -1296,22 +1296,38 @@ out:
* @lru: index of lru list the page is sitting on
* @nr_pages: positive when adding or negative when removing
*
- * This function must be called when a page is added to or removed from an
- * lru list.
+ * This function must be called under lruvec lock, just before a page is added
+ * to or just after a page is removed from an lru list (that ordering being so
+ * as to allow it to check that lru_size 0 is consistent with list_empty).
*/
void mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru,
int nr_pages)
{
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
unsigned long *lru_size;
+ long size;
+ bool empty;

if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return;

mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_zone, lruvec);
lru_size = mz->lru_size + lru;
- *lru_size += nr_pages;
- VM_BUG_ON((long)(*lru_size) < 0);
+ empty = list_empty(lruvec->lists + lru);
+
+ if (nr_pages < 0)
+ *lru_size += nr_pages;
+
+ size = *lru_size;
+ if (WARN(size < 0 || empty != !size,
+ "mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(%p, %d, %d): lru_size %ld but %sempty\n",
+ lruvec, lru, nr_pages, size, empty ? "" : "not ")) {
+ VM_BUG_ON(1);
+ *lru_size = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (nr_pages > 0)
+ *lru_size += nr_pages;
}

bool mem_cgroup_is_descendant(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *root)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/