Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Mon Feb 23 2015 - 11:42:01 EST

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> If you set ambient caps and then run a setuid program (without
> no_new_privs), then the ambient set *must* be cleared by the kernel
> because that's what the setuid program expects. Yes, the whole

Why would a setuid program expect that? I'd say we expect the ambient set
to remain in effect. What would break if the ambient set would stay

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at