Re: smp_call_function_single lockups

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:32:50AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Rafael David Tinoco <inaddy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is v3.19 + your patch (smp acquire/release)
> > - (nested kvm with 2 vcpus on top of proliant with x2apic cluster mode
> > and acpi_idle)
> 
> Hmm. There is absolutely nothing else going on on that machine, except
> for the single call to smp_call_function_single() that is waiting for
> the CSD to be released.
> 
> > * It looks like we got locked because of reentrant flush_tlb_* through
> > smp_call_*
> > but I'll leave it to you.
> 
> No, that is all a perfectly regular callchain:
> 
>  .. native_flush_tlb_others -> smp_call_function_many ->
> smp_call_function_single
> 
> but the stack contains some stale addresses (one is probably just from
> smp_call_function_single() calling into "generic_exec_single()", and
> thus the stack contains the return address inside
> smp_call_function_single() in _addition_ to the actual place where the
> watchdog timer then interrupted it).
> 
> It all really looks very regular and sane, and looks like
> smp_call_function_single() is happily just waiting for the IPI to
> finish in the (inlined) csd_lock_wait().
> 
> I see nothing wrong at all.

[11396.096002] Hardware name: OpenStack Foundation OpenStack Nova, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011

But its a virtual machine right? Its not running bare metal, its running
a !virt kernel on a virt machine, so maybe some of the virt muck is
borked?

A very subtly broken APIC emulation would be heaps of 'fun'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/