Re: [PATCH V6 00/12] Tegra xHCI support

[Andrew Bresticker]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:27:36AM -0800, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> > Sorry for taking so awfully long to look at this. I've spent some time
>> > looking at various pieces of documentation and I concluded that
>> > representing the port assignment as muxing options doesn't seem right
>> > after all. Instead I've come up with an alternate proposal (attached).
>> > Could you take a look and see if that sounds reasonable to you?
>>
>> Thanks for taking a look at this.  I've been meaning to pick this
>> series back up, but haven't had quite enough bandwidth lately.
>>
>> This all looks good to me, just one comment below:
>>
>> > +PHY nodes:
>> > +----------
>> > +
>> > +An optional child node named "phys" can contain nodes describing additional
>> > +properties of each PHY. Only USB3 and UTMI PHYs can be complemented in this
>> > +way, in which case the name of each node must match one of the following:
>> > +
>> > +  usb3-0, usb3-1, utmi-0, utmi-1, utmi-2
>> > +
>> > +Required properties for USB3 PHYs:
>> > +- nvidia,lanes: specifies the name of the lane that this USB3 PHY uses
>> > +- nvidia,port: specifies the number of the USB2 port that is used for this
>> > +  USB3 PHY
>> > +
>> > +Optional properties for UTMI PHYs:
>> > +- vbus-supply: regulator providing the VBUS voltage for the UTMI pad
>>
>> What about the HSIC PHYs?  Shouldn't they be represented as PHY nodes as well?
>
> Yes, they could. The PCIe and SATA PHYs could as well. I haven't
> included them because they currently don't take any properties. In
> addition to that, perhaps some of the nvidia,hsic-* properties could be
> moved into the PHY nodes, too. But they're also properties of the pin,
> so keeping them in the pinmux nodes seems fine as well.
>
> On a slightly different topic, I've been trying to wrap my head around
> the use of the nvidia,port property and my conclusion was that in fact
> one of the physical ports is shared between USB2 and USB3. That is the
> utmi-2 PHY and usb3-0 PHY go to the very same port. The vbus-supply
> specified in the Jetson TK1 DTS would support that (it's associated with
> utmi-2 but named vdd_usb3_reg, and the USB3 port doesn't work without
> it). Can you confirm that?

Yes, that is my understanding as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/