Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression

[David Miller]

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0800

> If you can take Petri's change now and Jaedon then resubmits on top of
> that change, would that be acceptable?

I think it should go the other way around.

The bug should be fixed in 'net'.

Then Petri can resubmit the cleanup relative to that once I merge
'net' into 'net-next'.  It's a cleanup so it's a net-next change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/