Re: [PATCH v6 03/15] soc/tegra: Add ram code reader helper
From: Alexandre Courbot
Date: Mon Mar 02 2015 - 03:47:22 EST
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Needed for the EMC and MC drivers to know what timings from the DT to use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> v4: Replace magic number with PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT
> ---
> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/tegra/fuse.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
> index 3bf5aba..dc96a62 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,13 @@
> #define APBMISC_SIZE 0x64
> #define FUSE_SKU_INFO 0x10
>
> +#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT 4
> +#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_LONG (0xf << PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT)
> +#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_SHORT (0x3 << PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT)
I think you are slightly over 80 chars here.
> +
> static void __iomem *apbmisc_base;
> static void __iomem *strapping_base;
> +static bool long_ram_code;
>
> u32 tegra_read_chipid(void)
> {
> @@ -54,6 +59,18 @@ u32 tegra_read_straps(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +u32 tegra_read_ram_code(void)
> +{
> + u32 straps = tegra_read_straps();
> +
> + if (long_ram_code)
> + straps &= PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_LONG;
> + else
> + straps &= PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_SHORT;
> +
> + return straps >> PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
> static const struct of_device_id apbmisc_match[] __initconst = {
> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-apbmisc", },
> {},
> @@ -112,4 +129,6 @@ void __init tegra_init_apbmisc(void)
> strapping_base = of_iomap(np, 1);
> if (!strapping_base)
> pr_err("ioremap tegra strapping_base failed\n");
> +
> + long_ram_code = of_property_read_bool(np, "nvidia,long-ram-code");
Is this long-ram property chip-dependent? If so, couldn't we just use
the chip ID or matched compatible string to decide whether the RAM
code length, instead of having a dedicated property for it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/