Re: [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock

[Daniel Wagner]

On 03/02/2015 04:23 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> These look good at first glance, but I do need to go over patches 3 and
> 4 in more detail.
>
> FWIW, usually when I see "RFC" in the subject, I take it as a hint that
> this is still work-in-progress and that you're looking for early feedback
> on it, and hence they it shouldn't be merged yet. Is that the case
> here, or would I be OK to merge these?

I screwed that part over. I wanted to send them as 'PATCH'. Though I 
have planned to do another benchmark round and see if it there isn't any 
problem left in there.

Thanks for going easy on me, first time looking at this end of the kernel :)

cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/