Re: [RFC v2 1/4] locks: Remove unnecessary IS_POSIX test

From: Jeff Layton
Date: Mon Mar 02 2015 - 19:55:40 EST


On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:25:10 +0100
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since following change
>
> commit bd61e0a9c852de2d705b6f1bb2cc54c5774db570
> Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Jan 16 15:05:55 2015 -0500
>
> locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context
>
> all Posix locks are kept on their a separate list, so the test is
> redudant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/locks.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 365c82e..f63aa92 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -964,8 +964,6 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
> */
> if (request->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
> list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
> - if (!IS_POSIX(fl))
> - continue;
> if (!posix_locks_conflict(request, fl))
> continue;
> if (conflock)

Merged for v4.1.

Thanks!
--
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/