Re: [proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang <david@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
>> in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc,
>> systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the
>> sole exlcusive process permitted to manage cgroups.  given that, just

> There is less agreement on the idea that PID1 will have exclusive control
> over cgroups than some of the posts make it seem.

david, small favour to ask you (for archival purposes as well as
convenience) - finding posts, or even the mailing lists themselves, on
which the discussions you mention may be found, turns out to be um
rather challenging if you happen not to have subscribed to those
lists, such that every day you've seen all the discussions and know
what to look for, and where.

 would you therefore be so kind as to publish some hints - specific
keyword phrases more general than "PID1 cgroups" which is about the
limit of what i can think might apply (which ironically comes up with
every archive linking to *this* thread.... *sigh*), or better perhaps
some specific references to specific mailing lists.

 many many thanks,

l.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/