Re: [PATCH v4 16/30] PCI/IA64: Fix the build warning about pci_domain_nr()

From: Yijing Wang
Date: Tue Mar 03 2015 - 03:35:41 EST


On 2015/3/3 10:56, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:12:10PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Should pass pci_bus * instead of pci_dev * to pci_domain_nr().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c | 6 +++---
>> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c
>> index 0640739..2fd7414 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c
>> @@ -364,12 +364,12 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info,
>> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(rootbus_handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>> &segment);
>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>> - if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev)) {
>> + if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev->bus)) {
>
> This is completely unrelated to the series, isn't it? It looks like this
> is a bug fix that should be handled separately and marked for stable.

Yes, it's a separate patch, I would move it out of this series, and post it out separately.

Thanks!
Yijing.

>
>> acpi_get_name(rootbus_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME,
>> &name_buffer);
>> printk(KERN_ERR
>> "%s: Segment number mismatch, 0x%llx vs 0x%x for: %s\n",
>> - __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev),
>> + __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev->bus),
>> (char *)name_buffer.pointer);
>> kfree(name_buffer.pointer);
>> return 1;
>> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info,
>> /* Build up the pcidev_info.pdi_slot_host_handle */
>> host_devfn = get_host_devfn(pcidev_match.handle, rootbus_handle);
>> (*pcidev_info)->pdi_slot_host_handle =
>> - ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev) << 40) |
>> + ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) << 40) |
>> /* bus == 0 */
>> host_devfn;
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c
>> index bcdc5b8..a97fad4 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c
>> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ sn_io_slot_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> panic("%s: Unable to alloc memory for sn_irq_info", __func__);
>>
>> /* Call to retrieve pci device information needed by kernel. */
>> - status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev),
>> + status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus),
>> (u64) dev->bus->number,
>> dev->devfn,
>> (u64) __pa(pcidev_info),
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>


--
Thanks!
Yijing

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/