On Sun, 2015-03-01 at 14:44 +0200, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -256,6 +256,13 @@ config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Tegra20 SOCs.
+config ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ
+ bool "Tegra124 CPUFreq support"
This adds a bool Kconfig symbol...
+ depends on ARCH_TEGRA && CPUFREQ_DT
+ default y
+ help
+ This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Tegra124 SOCs.
+
config ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ
tristate "Intel PXA2xx CPUfreq driver"
depends on PXA27x || PXA25x
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
index 312d9c3..d478b83 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SA1100_CPUFREQ) += sa1100-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SA1110_CPUFREQ) += sa1110-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SPEAR_CPUFREQ) += spear-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ) += tegra20-cpufreq.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ) += tegra124-cpufreq.o
... so this object will either not be built or be built-in.
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ) += vexpress-spc-cpufreq.o
##################################################################################
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..45778ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Tegra 124 cpufreq driver
+ *
+ * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
+ * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/cpufreq-dt.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
Is linux/module.h needed?
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
[...]
+static struct platform_driver tegra124_cpufreq_platdrv = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "cpufreq-tegra124",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.owner will always be, in short, NULL.
+ },
+ .probe = tegra124_cpufreq_probe,
+ .remove = tegra124_cpufreq_remove,
+};
[...]
+module_init(tegra_cpufreq_init);
This might as well be, I think, device_initcall().
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@xxxxxxxxxx>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("cpufreq driver for NVIDIA Tegra124");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
The strings in these macros will always be preprocessed away, because
this driver cannot become a module.
Paul Bolle