Re: [RFC] slub memory quarantine
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tue Mar 03 2015 - 11:42:15 EST
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 12:10 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > Please hold on with this.
> > Dmitry Chernenkov is working on a quarantine that works with both slub
> > and slab, does not cause spurious OOMs and does not depend on
> > slub-debug which has unacceptable performance (acquires global lock).
> I think that it's a separate issue. KASan already depend on slub_debug - it required for redzones/user tracking.
> I think that some parts slub debugging (like user tracking and this quarantine)
> could be moved (for CONFIG_KASAN=y) to the fast path without any locking.
In general these features need to be ifdeffed out since they add
significant overhead for the data structures and execution paths.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/