Re: [RFCv2 net-next 6/7] net: Refactor ip_defrag() APIs

From: Andy Zhou
Date: Tue Mar 03 2015 - 15:00:45 EST


Ah, I missed it. Currently it is passed via IPCB. Would it be better
to pass it as a parameter?

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02.03, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> From: Andy Zhou <azhou@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Currently, ip_defrag() does not keep track of the maximum fragmentation
>> size for each fragmented packet. This information is not necessary since
>> current Linux IP fragmentation always fragments a packet based on output
>> devices' MTU.
>
> It does, search for max_size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/