Re: [PATCH 5/8] zram: add dynamic device add/remove functionality

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue,  3 Mar 2015 21:49:47 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Introduce zram-control sysfs class, which has two sysfs attrs:
> - zram_add      -- add a new specific (device_id) zram device
> - zram_remove   -- remove a specific (device_id) zram device
> 
> Usage example:
> 	# add a new specific zram device
> 	echo 4 > /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
> 
> 	# remove a specific zram device
> 	echo 4 > /sys/class/zram-control/zram_remove
> 
> There is no automatic device_id generation, so user is expected to
> provide one.
> 
> NOTE, there might be users who already depend on the fact that at
> least zram0 device gets always created by zram_init(). Thus, due to
> compatibility reasons, along with requested device_id (f.e. 5) zram0
> will also be created.

This doesn't really explain why you think we need the patch.

- What's the current scheme for adding devices?

- What's wrong with it?

- Why is this better?

> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram |  23 ++++++
>  Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt            |  23 +++++-
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c              | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..99b2a1e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +What:		/sys/class/zram-control/
> +Date:		March 2015
> +KernelVersion:	4.1
> +Contact:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> +Description:
> +		The zram-control/ class sub-directory belongs to zram
> +		device class
> +
> +What:		/sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
> +Date:		March 2015
> +KernelVersion:	4.1
> +Contact:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> +Description:
> +		Add a specific /dev/zramX device, where X is a device_id
> +		provided by user
> +
> +		What:		/sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
> +Date:		March 2015
> +KernelVersion:	4.1
> +Contact:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> +Description:
> +		Remove a specific /dev/zramX device, where X is a device_id
> +		provided by user
> diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> index 7fcf9c6..4b140fa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> @@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ Following shows a typical sequence of steps for using zram.
>  1) Load Module:
>  	modprobe zram num_devices=4
>  	This creates 4 devices: /dev/zram{0,1,2,3}
> -	(num_devices parameter is optional. Default: 1)
> +
> +num_devices parameter is optional and tells zram how many devices should be
> +pre-created. Default: 1.
>  
>  2) Set max number of compression streams
>  	Compression backend may use up to max_comp_streams compression streams,
> @@ -97,7 +99,20 @@ size of the disk when not in use so a huge zram is wasteful.
>  	mkfs.ext4 /dev/zram1
>  	mount /dev/zram1 /tmp
>  
> -7) Stats:
> +7) Add/remove zram devices
> +
> +zram provides a control interface, which enables dynamic (on-demand) device
> +addition and removal.
> +
> +In order to add a new /dev/zramX device (where X is a unique device id)
> +execute
> +	echo X > /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
> +
> +To remove the existing /dev/zramX device (where X is a device id)
> +execute
> +	echo X > /sys/class/zram-control/zram_remove
> +
> +8) Stats:
>  	Per-device statistics are exported as various nodes under
>  	/sys/block/zram<id>/
>  		disksize
> @@ -113,11 +128,11 @@ size of the disk when not in use so a huge zram is wasteful.
>  		mem_used_total
>  		mem_used_max
>  
> -8) Deactivate:
> +9) Deactivate:
>  	swapoff /dev/zram0
>  	umount /dev/zram1
>  
> -9) Reset:
> +10) Reset:
>  	Write any positive value to 'reset' sysfs node
>  	echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset
>  	echo 1 > /sys/block/zram1/reset
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index bab8b20..a457e16 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -33,16 +33,23 @@
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  
>  #include "zram_drv.h"
>  
>  static DEFINE_IDR(zram_index_idr);
> +/* idr index must be protected */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(zram_index_mutex);
> +
>  static int zram_major;
>  static const char *default_compressor = "lzo";
>  
>  /* Module params (documentation at end) */
>  static unsigned int num_devices = 1;
>  
> +#define ZRAM_CTL_ADD		1
> +#define ZRAM_CTL_REMOVE		2
> +
>  #define ZRAM_ATTR_RO(name)						\
>  static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *d,				\
>  				struct device_attribute *attr, char *b)	\
> @@ -1173,6 +1180,109 @@ static void zram_remove(struct zram *zram)
>  	kfree(zram);
>  }
>  
> +/* lookup if there is any device pointer that match the given device_id.
> + * return device pointer if so, or ERR_PTR() otherwise. */
> +static struct zram *zram_lookup(int dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct zram *zram;
> +
> +	zram = idr_find(&zram_index_idr, dev_id);
> +	if (zram)
> +		return zram;
> +	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +}
> +
> +/* common zram-control add/remove handler */
> +static int zram_control(int cmd, const char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct zram *zram;
> +	int ret = -ENOSYS, err, dev_id;
> +
> +	/* dev_id is gendisk->first_minor, which is `int' */
> +	ret = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &dev_id);
> +	if (ret || dev_id < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&zram_index_mutex);
> +	zram = zram_lookup(dev_id);
> +
> +	switch (cmd) {
> +	case ZRAM_CTL_ADD:
> +		if (!IS_ERR(zram)) {
> +			ret = -EEXIST;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		ret = zram_add(dev_id);
> +		break;
> +	case ZRAM_CTL_REMOVE:
> +		if (IS_ERR(zram)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(zram);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* First, make ->disksize device attr RO, closing
> +		 * ZRAM_CTL_REMOVE vs disksize_store() race window */
> +		ret = sysfs_chmod_file(&disk_to_dev(zram->disk)->kobj,
> +				&dev_attr_disksize.attr, S_IRUGO);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +
> +		ret = zram_reset_device(zram);
> +		if (ret == 0) {
> +			/* ->disksize is RO and there are no ->bd_openers */
> +			zram_remove(zram);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* If there are still device bd_openers, try to make ->disksize
> +		 * RW again and return. even if we fail to make ->disksize RW,
> +		 * user still has RW ->reset attr. so it's possible to destroy
> +		 * that device */
> +		err = sysfs_chmod_file(&disk_to_dev(zram->disk)->kobj,
> +				&dev_attr_disksize.attr,
> +				S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO);
> +		if (err)
> +			ret = err;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&zram_index_mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* zram module control sysfs attributes */
> +static ssize_t zram_add_store(struct class *class,
> +			struct class_attribute *attr,
> +			const char *buf,
> +			size_t count)
> +{
> +	int ret = zram_control(ZRAM_CTL_ADD, buf);
> +
> +	return ret ? ret : count;
> +}

The types here are confused.  `ret' is int, `count' is size_t, the
function returns ssize_t and heaven knows what type "ret ?  ret :
count" evaluates to!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/