Re: [PATCH 4/4] regulator: qcom: Rework to single platform device

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:01:43PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/03/15 15:52, Mark Brown wrote:

> > ...but of course we'd never try any operations on it anyway as there
> > would be no consumers.

> Yes sounds fine. The only concern is that we're probably wasting memory
> with things that won't ever "match" something in DT.

You still get diagnostic output about what the regulator state is which
is useful in itself and the amount of memory involved is really not
enough to worry about in the grand scheme of things.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature