Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Use generic compat audit code

[Brian Gerst]

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Use the generic compat syscall audit code instead of an x86 specific
>> implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/Kconfig                |  5 +--
>>  arch/x86/ia32/Makefile          |  3 --
>>  arch/x86/ia32/audit.c           | 43 ---------------------
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/unistd32.h |  2 +
>>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile        |  2 -
>>  arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c      | 82 -----------------------------------------
>>  6 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/ia32/audit.c
>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/unistd32.h
>>  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c
>
> Nice!
>
> Because there are many types of conversions it would be nice if the
> changelog included a declaration of some sorts about what this means
> precisely: 'the two implementations were 100% identical', or 'the x86
> one was buggy and we now switch to the correct generic one', or 'the
> only difference between the two is X, Y and Z, which is not a
> problem'?
>
> Thanks,
>
>         Ingo

The generic compat version was added along with the arm64 support.  It
is functionally equivalent to the x86-specific implementation.  The
main difference is using audit_is_compat() instead of a hardcoded
check for AUDIT_ARCH_I386.

I just noticed a bug in lib/compat_audit.c though.  It is missing __NR_execveat.

--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/