Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: pmc_atom: Add Cherrytrail support
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Mar 04 2015 - 05:45:06 EST
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:37 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2015/2/23 20:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 23:49 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> This is the reworked patch series which had been sent earlier [1] to support
> >> Intel CherryTrail SoC.
> >>
> >> The patches were tested on both BayTrail and CherryTrail SoCs.
> >>
> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5235891/
> >
> > Aubrey, is everything is clear for you now? Can I send v3 with your
> > Ack's?
> The patches overall look good to me, except a few minor comments need to
> be addressed in the last conversation. For example, I think we don't
> need patch 1/4 if we won't use dev_print.
We still use them. Like I said the patch has no relations to the series,
though it simplifies already existing function.
> some other changes might be
> necessary only if they makes code cleaner and works better.
Thus, I think the patch 1/4 is still useful.
> Certainly, it would be better if other x86 maintainers can take a look
> at these patches.
Agree.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/