Re: [PATCH RFT v2] x86: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure

[Sudeep Holla]

On 04/03/15 11:27, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:15:49AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > I can do that, but wouldn't that add confusion as this commit is not
> > changing that behaviour. It's already changed in v4.0-rc1
>
> Nah, this would add a reference to the fact that the cpumask format is
> not really a stable thing and thus cannot be considered a userpsace
> regression. And having this info is important IMO in case someone is
> wondering in the future.

Thanks for clarifying, will add that info. Now I think it completely
makes sense especially since this commit will be the first target when
user-space first notice this cpumask format change.

> In general, having more and even redundant info in the commit messages
> is much better than having less info. I can't count the times I've been
> staring at a one-liner commit message and trying to rhyme up what was
> the purpose of doing it this way.
>
> So more is more, in this case. :-)

Agreed :)

--
Regards,
Sudeep

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/