RE: [tip:perf/core] Revert "perf: Remove the extra validity check on nr_pages"

[Liang, Kan]

> 
> 
> * Liang, Kan <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > * tip-bot for Kan Liang <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > > > @@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ static int perf_mmap(struct file *file, struct
> > > vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > >  	 * If we have rb pages ensure they're a power-of-two number, so
> > > we
> > > >  	 * can do bitmasks instead of modulo.
> > > >  	 */
> > > > -	if (!is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > > > +	if (nr_pages != 0 && !is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > Hm, what does is_power_of_2(0) return? It should return 0, because 0
> is
> > > not a power of 2!
> > >
> > > and if it's fixed to return 0, then the check should properly be
> something
> > > like:
> > >
> > > 	if (!nr_pages || !is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > >
> > > or so?
> >
> > nr_pages == 0 is valid, we cannot return -EINVAL. Because
> > 	vma_size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
> > 	nr_pages = (vma_size / PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
> >
> > So here we only want to check is_power_of_2
> > when the pages > 1 (or nr_pages > 0).
> 
> I don't think you answered my first question, on which my later
> comments rely:
> 
> > > Hm, what does is_power_of_2(0) return? It should return 0, because 0
> is
> > > not a power of 2!

Yes,  is_power_of_2(0) returns 0.

Thanks,
Kan

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/