Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: caam: fix some compile warnings

[Kim Phillips]

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:03:28 +0200
Cristian Stoica <cristian.stoica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/04/2015 06:57 AM, yjin wrote:
> > An alternative is moving the definitions to a ".c" file, but I don't
> > think it will be fundamental different.
> > I know I am fixing a potential error which doesn't exist now, it seems
> > useless for the current upstream version, we can abandon my patch. But I
> > still think the current implementation adds unnecessary restrictions for
> > its users.
> 
> I think that both dma_map_sg_chained and dma_unmap_sg_chained should go
> away. They were added to support chained scatterlists, but as far as I
> verified, dma_map_sg should handle that case as well.
> 
> Kim, can you confirm this?

I don't see how, e.g., for one, dma_map_sg is I/O TLB
implementation-dependent.

Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/