Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
From: Mark Rutland
Date: Thu Mar 05 2015 - 06:04:46 EST
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> tiny tiny nitpick:
>
> On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
> ^ an
Whoops.
Rafael, are you happy to fix that up, or would you like me to resend?
> > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
> > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
> > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
>
> And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
> or we don't care ?
Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read
over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious.
I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most
important thing.
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/