Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/fpu: math_state_restore() should not blindly disable irqs

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 03/06, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > [...] The patch above looks "obviously safe", but perhaps I am
> > paranoid too much...
>
> IMHO your hack above isn't really acceptable, even for a backport.
> So lets test the patch below (assuming it's the right thing to do)
> and move forward?

OK, but please note that this patch is not beckportable. If you think
that -stable doesn't need this fix, then I agree.

If the caller is do_device_not_available(), then we can not enable
irqs before __thread_fpu_begin() + restore_fpu_checking().

1. Preemption in between can destroy ->fpu.state initialized by
   fpu_finit(), __switch_to() will save the live (wrong) FPU state
   again.

2. kernel_fpu_begin() from irq right after __thread_fpu_begin() is
   not nice too. It will do __save_init_fpu() and this overwrites
   ->fpu.state too.

Starting from v4.0 it does kernel_fpu_disable(), but the older kernels
do not.

Ingo, this code is really horrible and fragile. We need to cleanup it
step-by-step, imho.

> ======================>
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:37:57 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Don't disable irqs in math_state_restore()
>
> math_state_restore() was historically called with irqs disabled,
> because that's how the hardware generates the trap, and also because
> back in the days it was possible for it to be an asynchronous
> interrupt and interrupt handlers run with irqs off.
>
> These days it's always an instruction trap, and furthermore it does
> inevitably complex things such as memory allocation and signal
> processing, which is not done with irqs disabled.
>
> So keep irqs enabled.
>
> This might surprise in-kernel FPU users that somehow relied on
> interrupts being disabled across FPU usage - but that's
> fundamentally fragile anyway due to the inatomicity of FPU state
> restores. The trap return will restore interrupts to its previous
> state, but if FPU ops trigger math_state_restore() there's no
> guarantee of atomicity anymore.
>
> To warn about in-kernel irqs-off users of FPU state we might want to
> pass 'struct pt_regs' to math_state_restore() and check the trapped
> state for irqs disabled (flags has IF cleared) and kernel context -
> but that's for a later patch.
>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index 950815a138e1..52f9e4057cee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -844,8 +844,9 @@ void math_state_restore(void)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
>
> +	local_irq_enable();
> +
>  	if (!tsk_used_math(tsk)) {
> -		local_irq_enable();
>  		/*
>  		 * does a slab alloc which can sleep
>  		 */
> @@ -856,7 +857,6 @@ void math_state_restore(void)
>  			do_group_exit(SIGKILL);
>  			return;
>  		}
> -		local_irq_disable();
>  	}
>
>  	/* Avoid __kernel_fpu_begin() right after __thread_fpu_begin() */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/