Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] devicetree: bindings: Document qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id

[Christopher Covington]

On 03/05/2015 09:28 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> The top level qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id are utilized by bootloaders
>>>>> on Qualcomm MSM platforms to determine which device tree should be
>>>>> utilized and passed to the kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Is this the special magic that allows qcom bootloaders to take a kernel
>>>> plus multiple DTBs and figure out which DTB to pass?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> yes
>>
>> That's a bummer.
>>
>> Luckily, the solution for upstream is still quite simple: Provide only
>> one devicetree, and it'll be used, right?
>>
> 
> I never managed to figure out how to get that to work (at least on my
> apq8074 dragonboard.. fortunately ifc6540 seems to work w/ appended
> dtb).. kind of a pita because it is a bit of a non-standard boot.img
> format too..

I think you're talking about the boot flow from plain poweron which I wish I
knew more about, but in case it's any help, here are some fastboot boot steps
what worked for me a while back.

http://elinux.org/Dragonboard/APQ8074

Chris

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/