Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: divider: three exactness fixes (and a rant)

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:44:05AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/06/15 10:57, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >
> > Uwe,
> >
> > Thanks for the fixes. I'm thinking of taking all three for 4.0. I also
> > agree on clk_round_rate_nearest (along with a _ceil and _floor version
> > as well). That's something we can do for 4.1 probably.
> >
> > There are currently 3 users of CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST:
> >
> > Loongson
> > QCOM
> > ST
> >
> > So now is probably the right time to remove the flag if we're going to
> > do it.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> 
> I may have had to do divider round closest on qcom platforms because of
> the problem these patches are for. I'll have to go back and look.
When you do that, also check if it works for you. I think the
implementation is broken for most of the cases.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/