Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] watchdog: at91sam9: request the irq with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Sat Mar 07 2015 - 04:07:32 EST
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:10:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> enable_irq_wake() has no effect on IRQF_NO_SUSPEND interrupts, so if the
> driver uses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, it does not need to use enable_irq_wake()
> in addition to that.
I still feel we should BUG when someone is calling enable_irq_wake() on
an irq with only one desc which has NO_SUSPEND set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/