Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Fix lock optimistic spinning when owner is not running

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:45:31PM -0800, Jason Low wrote:
>  static noinline
>  bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
>  {
>  	long count;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> +	while (sem->owner == owner) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_
> +		 * checking sem->owner still matches owner, if that fails,
> +		 * owner might point to free()d memory, if it still matches,
> +		 * the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid.
> +		 */
> +		barrier();
> +
> +		/* abort spinning when need_resched or owner is not running */
> +		if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched()) {
>  			rcu_read_unlock();
>  			return false;
>  		}


Thanks, looks good; do we want to change the mutex code (again) to more
closely resemble this too? It still has the while (true) instead of the
while(lock->owner != owner).


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/