Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] cgroups: add a pids subsystem

[Tejun Heo]

On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:34:05PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > +	for (p = pids; p; p = p->parent) {
> > +		long new;
> > +
> > +		new = atomic_long_add_return(num, &p->counter);
> > +
> > +		if (p->limit == PIDS_UNLIMITED)
> > +			continue;
> 
> Huh?  So, the counter stays out of sync if unlimited?  What happens
> when it gets set to something else later?

Oops, I misread the code, but why is PIDS_UNLIMITED a special case?
Just make it a number which always makes the condition true?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/