Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] power: rt5033_charger: Add RT5033 charger device driver
From: Beomho Seo
Date: Mon Mar 09 2015 - 00:54:31 EST
On 03/09/2015 12:46 PM, Beomho Seo wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 10:50 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> Hi Beomho,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:23:10AM +0900, Beomho Seo wrote:
>>> This patch add device driver of Richtek RT5033 PMIC. The driver support
>>> switching charger. rt5033 charger provide three charging mode.
>>> Three charging mode are pre charge mode, fast cahrge mode and constant voltage
>>> mode. They are have vary charge rate, charge parameters. The charge parameters
>>> can be controlled by i2c interface.
>>
>> Driver looks mostly ok, but I have some comments [inline].
>>
>>> Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v5
>>> - none.
>>> Changes in v4
>>> - Change power supply type to POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_MAINS.
>>> Changes in v3
>>> Changes in v2
>>> - none
>>>
>>> drivers/power/Kconfig | 8 +
>>> drivers/power/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/power/rt5033_charger.c | 485 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 494 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/power/rt5033_charger.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/Kconfig b/drivers/power/Kconfig
>>> index 27b751b..67e9af7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/power/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/power/Kconfig
>>> @@ -418,6 +418,14 @@ config BATTERY_RT5033
>>> The fuelgauge calculates and determines the battery state of charge
>>> according to battery open circuit voltage.
>>>
>>> +config CHARGER_RT5033
>>> + tristate "RT5033 battery charger support"
>>> + depends on MFD_RT5033
>>> + help
>>> + This adds support for battery charger in Richtek RT5033 PMIC.
>>> + The device supports pre-charge mode, fast charge mode and
>>> + constant voltage mode.
>>> +
>>> source "drivers/power/reset/Kconfig"
>>>
>>> endif # POWER_SUPPLY
>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/Makefile b/drivers/power/Makefile
>>> index 36f9e0d..c5d72e0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/power/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/power/Makefile
>>> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CHARGER_BQ2415X) += bq2415x_charger.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CHARGER_BQ24190) += bq24190_charger.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CHARGER_BQ24735) += bq24735-charger.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_POWER_AVS) += avs/
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_POWER_RT5033) += rt5033_charger.o
>>
>> this should be
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CHARGER_RT5033) += rt5033_charger.o
>>
>> according to your Kconfig patch. How did you test it actually?
>>
>
> Sorry, My mistake. This patch have been tested on my board.
> I will double-check before send patch set.
>
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CHARGER_SMB347) += smb347-charger.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CHARGER_TPS65090) += tps65090-charger.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_POWER_RESET) += reset/
>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/rt5033_charger.c b/drivers/power/rt5033_charger.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..7f8f6c3
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/power/rt5033_charger.c
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> +static int rt5033_get_charger_current(struct rt5033_charger *charger,
>>> + enum power_supply_property psp)
>>> +{
>>> + struct regmap *regmap = charger->rt5033->regmap;
>>> + unsigned int state, reg_data, data;
>>> +
>>> + if (psp == POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX)
>>> + return RT5033_CHG_MAX_CURRENT;
>>
>> drop this psp check and the psp parameter to this function, so that
>> the function only takes care of the current current.
>>
>
> OK. I will remove above lines.
>
>>> + regmap_read(regmap, RT5033_REG_CHG_CTRL5, ®_data);
>>> +
>>> + state = (reg_data >> RT5033_CHGCTRL5_ICHG_SHIFT) & 0xf;
>>> +
>>> + if (state > RT5033_CHG_MAX_CURRENT)
>>> + state = RT5033_CHG_MAX_CURRENT;
>>> +
>>> + data = state * 100 + 700;
>>> +
>>> + return data;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rt5033_get_charge_voltage(struct rt5033_charger *charger,
>>> + enum power_supply_property psp)
>>> +{
>>> + struct regmap *regmap = charger->rt5033->regmap;
>>> + unsigned int state, reg_data, data;
>>> +
>>> + if (psp == POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE_MAX)
>>> + return RT5033_CHARGER_CONST_VOLTAGE_LIMIT_MAX;
>>
>> drop this psp check and the psp parameter to this function, so that
>> the function only takes care of the current voltage.
>>
>
> OK. I will remove above lines.
>
>>> + regmap_read(regmap, RT5033_REG_CHG_CTRL2, ®_data);
>>> +
>>> + state = reg_data >> 2;
>>> +
>>> + data = RT5033_CHARGER_CONST_VOLTAGE_LIMIT_MIN +
>>> + RT5033_CHARGER_CONST_VOLTAGE_STEP_NUM * state;
>>> +
>>> + if (data > RT5033_CHARGER_CONST_VOLTAGE_LIMIT_MAX)
>>> + data = RT5033_CHARGER_CONST_VOLTAGE_LIMIT_MAX;
>>> +
>>> + return data;
>>> +}
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> +
>>> +static enum power_supply_property rt5033_charger_props[] = {
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPE,
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW,
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX,
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE,
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE_MAX,
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_MODEL_NAME,
>>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_MANUFACTURER,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int rt5033_charger_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
>>> + enum power_supply_property psp,
>>> + union power_supply_propval *val)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rt5033_charger *charger = container_of(psy,
>>> + struct rt5033_charger, psy);
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (psp) {
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS:
>>> + val->intval = rt5033_get_charger_state(charger);
>>> + break;
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPE:
>>> + val->intval = rt5033_get_charger_type(charger);
>>> + break;
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW:
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX:
>>> + val->intval = rt5033_get_charger_current(charger, psp);
>>> + break;
>>
>> remove the special handling of POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX in
>> rt5033_get_charger_current() and do it like this:
>>
>> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW:
>> val->intval = rt5033_get_charger_current(charger);
>> break;
>> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX:
>> val->intval = RT5033_CHG_MAX_CURRENT;
>> break;
>>
>
> OK. I will change comply with your comment.
>
RT5033_CHG_MAX_CURRENT is register value(hex).
So It is better:
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX:
val->intval = RT5033_CHARGER_FAST_CURRENT_MAX;
And then I will fix rt5033_get_charger_current function more readable.
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE:
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE_MAX:
>>> + val->intval = rt5033_get_charge_voltage(charger, psp);
>>> + break;
>>
>> same as current handling:
>>
>> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE:
>> val->intval = rt5033_get_charge_voltage(charger);
>> break;
>> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE_MAX:
>> val->intval = RT5033_CHARGER_CONST_VOLTAGE_LIMIT_MAX;
>> break;
>>
>
> Ditto.
>
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_MODEL_NAME:
>>> + val->strval = RT5033_CHARGER_MODEL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_MANUFACTURER:
>>> + val->strval = RT5033_MANUFACTURER;
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> +static int rt5033_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rt5033_charger *charger;
>>> + struct rt5033_dev *rt5033 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + charger = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*charger), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!charger)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, charger);
>>> + charger->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + charger->rt5033 = rt5033;
>>> +
>>> + charger->chg = rt5033_charger_dt_init(pdev);
>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(charger->chg))
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + ret = rt5033_charger_reg_init(charger);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + charger->psy.name = "rt5033-charger",
>>> + charger->psy.type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_MAINS,
>>> + charger->psy.properties = rt5033_charger_props,
>>> + charger->psy.num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(rt5033_charger_props),
>>> + charger->psy.get_property = rt5033_charger_get_property,
>>> +
>>> + ret = power_supply_register(&pdev->dev, &charger->psy);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register power supply\n");
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>
>> We have devm_power_supply_register() now, which would result in
>> complete removal of the rt5033_charger_remove() function :)
>>
>
> OK, I will change comply with your comment.
>
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rt5033_charger_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rt5033_charger *charger = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +
>>> + power_supply_unregister(&charger->psy);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct platform_device_id rt5033_charger_id[] = {
>>> + { "rt5033-charger", },
>>> + { }
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, rt5033_charger_id);
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver rt5033_charger_driver = {
>>> + .driver = {
>>> + .name = "rt5033-charger",
>>> + },
>>> + .probe = rt5033_charger_probe,
>>> + .remove = rt5033_charger_remove,
>>> + .id_table = rt5033_charger_id,
>>> +};
>>> +module_platform_driver(rt5033_charger_driver);
>>> +
>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Richtek RT5033 charger driver");
>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>
>> This should be
>>
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>> -- Sebastian
>>
>
> Thanks your comment.
> I will change this patch as soon as I possibly can.
>
> Best regards,
> Beomho Seo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/