Re: [PATCH] spmi: pmic_arb: enable build on arm64 platforms

[Stanimir Varbanov]

On 02/23/2015 02:57 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:46 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:27 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2015 05:14 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:05 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>>> On 02/03/2015 10:42 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>>>>> index bf1295e..115348c 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>>>>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if SPMI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
>>>>>>>         tristate "Qualcomm MSM SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
>>>>>>> -       depends on ARM
>>>>>>> +       depends on ARM || ARM64
>>>>>>>         depends on IRQ_DOMAIN
>>>>>>>         depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
>>>>>>>         default ARCH_QCOM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But only if COMPILE_TEST is set too, isn't it? Is that intended?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the driver will be used on arm64 qcom platforms, also.
>>>>
>>>> But ARCH_QCOM currently is (32 bit) arch/arm only, isn't it?
>>>
>>> Currently yes, but we want to be prepared to support PMIC's which will
>>> be used on arm64 platforms, although they are not upstream yet.
>>
>> Please make the commit summary reflect that, as in:
>>     "spmi: pmic_arb: enable test build on arm64"
>>
>> Commit explanation likewise.
> 
> What if we just drop ARM dependency? 

I'm fine with this, Paul?

-- 
regards,
Stan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/