Re: NMI watchdog triggering during load_balance

[David Ahern]

On 3/6/15 12:29 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 11:37 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>
> > But, I do not understand how the wrong topology is causing the NMI
> > watchdog to trigger. In the end there are still N domains, M groups per
> > domain and P cpus per group. Doesn't the balancing walk over all of them
> > irrespective of physical topology?
>
> You have this size extra large CPU domain that you shouldn't have,
> massive collisions therein ensue.

I was able to get the socket/cores/threads issue resolved, so the 
topology is correct. But still need to check out a few things. Thanks 
Mike and Peter for the suggestions.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/