Re: heads up/RFC: 'perf trace' using ordered_events
From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Mar 10 2015 - 02:12:41 EST
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> For trace I need to take advantage of the fact that each mmap is ordered
> already and then just sort by the timestamp in the mmap head, etc.
>
> In retrospect, the perf.data file should have kept that ordering, i.e.
> have one file per mmap, that would be saved in parallel, without any of
> those PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND records.
>
> But I have to experiment with that, leaving the existing code around to
> deal with older files.
It seems like what you said is almost same as my multi-thread work.
It saves data files per mmap and then merges them with an index
table so that they can be processed in parallel.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/