Re: [PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor

From: Marc Kleine-Budde
Date: Tue Mar 10 2015 - 03:50:44 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [x86/asm/entry] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request"
Previous message: Frans Klaver: "Re: [PATCH 01/60] mtd: core: tone down suggestion that dev.parent should be set"
In reply to: Florian Westphal: "[PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 03/10/2015 04:48 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> It is identical to the can destructor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied to can-next.

Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [x86/asm/entry] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request"
Previous message: Frans Klaver: "Re: [PATCH 01/60] mtd: core: tone down suggestion that dev.parent should be set"
In reply to: Florian Westphal: "[PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]