Re: [PATCH V5 00/25] perf tools: Introduce an abstraction for Instruction Tracing

[Adrian Hunter]

On 7/03/2015 11:06 p.m., Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here is V5 of some more preparatory patches for Intel PT
> that introduce an abstraction for Instruction tracing.
>
> The Intel PT driver is not yet in tip.
>
> Peter, could we please have Alex's 14 patches applied to
> tip?

Peter, I know you are really busy, but it would be helpful to know
what you plan to do?

> The master branch of the tree:
>
> 	git://git.infradead.org/users/ahunter/linux-perf.git
>
> contains these patches plus Intel PT and BTS and the kernel driver.
>
> Arnaldo, I have re-based on tip because of the conflict
> with your ordered-events changes. I will have a closer look
> at that next week.

I took a closer look and resolved the conflict by introducing:

static int perf_session__deliver_ordered_event(struct ordered_events *oe,
                                               struct ordered_event *event,
                                               struct perf_sample *sample)
{
        struct perf_session *session =
                        container_of(oe, struct perf_session, ordered_events);

        return perf_session__deliver_event(session, event->event, sample,
                                           oe->tool, event->file_offset);
}

I will send another revision of the patch set, but I am also
considered renaming everything from "itrace" to something more
generic. Possibly "auxtrace" or "hwtrace". Any preferences?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/