Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] ARM: at91: add soc detection infrastructure

[Nicolas Ferre]

Le 11/03/2015 18:00, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add new structures and functions to handle AT91 SoC detection.
> 
> [alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: reworked DBGU detection]
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig            |   1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile |   2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c    | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h    |  48 +++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index e7ce6612bc42..f6c5b05e8de8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91
>  	select IRQ_DOMAIN
>  	select PINCTRL
>  	select PINCTRL_AT91
> +	select SOC_BUS
>  	select USE_OF
>  	help
>  	  This enables support for systems based on Atmel
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> index 827fdbcce1c7..44a5c1a92b39 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  # Makefile for the linux kernel.
>  #
>  
> -obj-y		:= setup.o
> +obj-y		:= setup.o soc.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9)	+= sam9_smc.o
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..332698dbf572
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Atmel
> + *
> + * Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> + * Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"AT91: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +#include "soc.h"
> +
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR			0x40
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_ARCH(x)		(((x) >> 20) & 0xff)
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(x)	((x) & 0x1f)
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT		BIT(31)
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK	0x7fffffe0
> +#define AT91_DBGU_EXID			0x44
> +
> +struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc_family *families)
> +{
> +	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> +	const struct at91_soc_family *family;
> +	const struct at91_soc *soc;
> +	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	void __iomem *regs;
> +	u32 cidr, exid;
> +
> +
> +	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu");
> +	if (!np)
> +		np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
> +					     "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu");
> +
> +	if (!np) {
> +		pr_warn("Could not find DBGU node");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +
> +	if (!regs) {
> +		pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
> +	exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
> +
> +	iounmap(regs);
> +
> +	for (family = families; family->name; family++) {
> +		if (family->id == AT91_DBGU_CIDR_ARCH(cidr))

Well, I wouldn't use this field as a "family" differentiator.
For SoC which are part of a family, if there is one, we usually have a
more precise distinction than at91sam9/sama5/sam9xe.
The families are a group of SoCs that share the same IPs and same design
(usually the same die as well...).

So, can you please re-spin the series and remove this notion: only keep
type as family and sub-type as SoC (you can even use these words for the
comment (see below)).


> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!family->name) {
> +		pr_warn("Could not find matching SoC family\n");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (soc = family->socs; soc->name; soc++) {
> +		if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!(cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!soc->name) {
> +		pr_warn("Could not find matching SoC description\n");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!soc_dev_attr)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	soc_dev_attr->family = family->name;
> +	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc->subname ? soc->subname : soc->name;
> +	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%X",
> +					   AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
> +	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> +	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> +		kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> +		kfree(soc_dev_attr);
> +		pr_warn("Could not register SoC device\n");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_info("Detected soc type: %s, revision %X\n", soc->name,

Well, we can have a more appropriated wording:

s/soc type/SoC family/

> +		AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
> +	if (soc->subname)
> +		pr_info("Detected soc subtype: %s\n", soc->subname);

s/soc subtype/SoC/

> +
> +	return soc_dev;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..66dcd146601a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Atmel
> + *
> + * Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __AT91_SOC_H
> +#define __AT91_SOC_H
> +
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +struct at91_soc {
> +	u32 cidr_match;
> +	u32 exid_match;
> +	const char *name;
> +	const char *subname;
> +};
> +
> +struct at91_soc_family {
> +	int id;
> +	const char *name;
> +	const struct at91_soc *socs;
> +};
> +
> +#define AT91_SOC(__cidr, __exid, __name, __subname)		\
> +	{							\
> +		.cidr_match = (__cidr),				\
> +		.exid_match = (__exid),				\
> +		.name = (__name),				\
> +		.subname = (__subname),				\
> +	}
> +
> +#define AT91_SOC_FAMILY(__id, __name, __socs)			\
> +	{							\
> +		.id = (__id),					\
> +		.name = (__name),				\
> +		.socs = (__socs),				\
> +	}
> +
> +struct soc_device * __init
> +at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc_family *families);
> +
> +#endif /* __AT91_SOC_H */
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/