next-20150313's block is broken, but fix available [was: Re: block: fully initialize queue in blk_mq_init_allocated_queue]

[Mike Snitzer]

On Fri, Mar 13 2015 at  8:37am -0400,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On (03/13/15 08:24), Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Thanks, but I already fixed these 2 patches and pushed them to
> > linux-dm.git's for-next branch last night (I also posted v3 of the
> > corresponding patches to LKML at that time).
> 
> oh, I see. didn't know that.
> 
> > Sorry to waste your time, I've learned my lesson:
> > 
> 
> no problem.
> 
> > Hopefully linux-next was able to pick up my new 'for-next' and we don't
> > have an entire weekend of linux-next crashes due to my idiocy.
> 
> nope, this is how I spot it -- next-20150313 doesn't boot.

Hi Stephen,

Is there any opportunity to get the tree fixed by re-pulling
linux-dm.git's 'for-next'?  I'd hate to kill linux-next productivity
this weekend!  Sorry about this.

Please advise, thanks.
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/