Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Replace cpu_suspend by the common ARM/ARM64 function

[Catalin Marinas]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:29:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Call the common ARM/ARM64 'arm_cpuidle_suspend' instead of cpu_suspend function
> which is specific to ARM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c
> index 39a2c62..0cea244 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int arm64_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  		 * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a
>  		 * parameter.
>  		 */
> -		ret = cpu_suspend(idx);
> +		arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx);

Nitpick: why don't we just rename the arm one cpuidle_suspend()?

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/