Re: [PATCH] tracing: add trace event for memory-failure
From: Xie XiuQi
Date: Mon Mar 16 2015 - 09:06:09 EST
On 2015/3/16 17:27, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:10:51PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
>> Memory-failure as the high level machine check handler, it's necessary
>> to report memory page recovery action result to user space by ftrace.
>>
>> This patch add a event at ras group for memory-failure.
>>
>> The output like below:
>> # tracer: nop
>> #
>> # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 2/2 #P:24
>> #
>> # _-----=> irqs-off
>> # / _----=> need-resched
>> # | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
>> # || / _--=> preempt-depth
>> # ||| / delay
>> # TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
>> # | | | |||| | |
>> mce-inject-13150 [001] .... 277.019359: memory_failure_event: pfn 0x19869: free buddy page recovery: Delayed
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/ras/ras_event.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> mm/memory-failure.c | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> index 79abb9c..0a6c8f3 100644
>> --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> @@ -232,6 +232,42 @@ TRACE_EVENT(aer_event,
>> __print_flags(__entry->status, "|", aer_uncorrectable_errors))
>> );
>>
>> +/*
>> + * memory-failure recovery action result event
>> + *
>> + * unsigned long pfn - Page Number of the corrupted page
>> + * char * action - Recovery action: "free buddy", "free huge", "high
>> + * order kernel", "free buddy, 2nd try", "different
>> + * compound page after locking", "hugepage already
>> + * hardware poisoned", "unmapping failed", "already
>> + * truncated LRU", etc.
>
> Listing all possible values here might be prone to become out of date when
> someone try to add/remove/change action_result() call sites.
> So I'd like to have some enumerator to bundle these strings in one place
> in mm/memory-failure.c.
> # I feel like doing this later.
Good, we need this.
>
>> + * char * result - Action result: Ignored, Failed, Delayed, Recovered.
>
> mm/memory-failure.c has good explanation:
>
> /*
> * Error handlers for various types of pages.
> */
> enum outcome {
> IGNORED, /* Error: cannot be handled */
> FAILED, /* Error: handling failed */
> DELAYED, /* Will be handled later */
> RECOVERED, /* Successfully recovered */
> };
>
> So adding a reference to here looks better to me.
Thanks for you comments. I'll change it.
>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
>
>> + */
>> +TRACE_EVENT(memory_failure_event,
>> + TP_PROTO(const unsigned long pfn,
>> + const char *action,
>> + const char *result),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(pfn, action, result),
>> +
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field(unsigned long, pfn)
>> + __string(action, action)
>> + __string(result, result)
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->pfn = pfn;
>> + __assign_str(action, action);
>> + __assign_str(result, result);
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_printk("pfn %#lx: %s page recovery: %s",
>> + __entry->pfn,
>> + __get_str(action),
>> + __get_str(result)
>> + )
>> +);
>> #endif /* _TRACE_HW_EVENT_MC_H */
>>
>> /* This part must be outside protection */
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index d487f8d..86a9cce 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>> #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
>> #include <linux/kfifo.h>
>> #include "internal.h"
>> +#include <ras/ras_event.h>
>>
>> int sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill __read_mostly = 0;
>>
>> @@ -837,6 +838,8 @@ static struct page_state {
>> */
>> static void action_result(unsigned long pfn, char *msg, int result)
>> {
>> + trace_memory_failure_event(pfn, msg, action_name[result]);
>> +
>> pr_err("MCE %#lx: %s page recovery: %s\n",
>> pfn, msg, action_name[result]);
>> }
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/